Shutdown Chaos Meets Supreme Court Skepticism: Markets Navigate Historic Uncertainty

In partnership with

The Week That Changed Everything

Markets entered November riding seasonal optimism and fresh all-time highs. A week later, that confidence has evaporated into genuine uncertainty.

The damage so far:

• S&P 500: Down to 6,720 by Thursday, erasing most late-October gains

• Nasdaq: Shed nearly 2% in a single session

• Bitcoin: Now around $102,000, down from October's $126,000 peak

• Russell 2000: Broke below its 50-day moving average for the first time since August

What makes this different:

This isn't typical volatility. We're navigating a perfect storm of policy chaos, constitutional questions, and an information vacuum unprecedented in modern markets:

• 37-day government shutdown — the longest in U.S. history — has cut off critical economic data

• Supreme Court questioning whether Trump's tariffs (which have collected $90 billion) are even constitutional

• Federal Reserve forced to set policy blind, signaling December cuts aren't guaranteed

Welcome to investing in the fog.

Missed OpenAI? The Clock Is Ticking on RAD Intel’s Round

Ground floor opportunity on predictive AI for ROI-based content.

RAD Intel is already trusted by a who’s-who of Fortune 1000 brands and leading global agencies with recurring seven-figure partnerships in place.

$50M+ raised. 10,000+ investors. Valuation up 4,900% in four years*.

Backed by Adobe and insiders from Google. Shares at $0.81 until Nov 20 — then the price moves. Invest now.

Lock $0.81 Shares Before 11/20

_{This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker “RADI” has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.}

The Data Blackout: Flying Blind at 30,000 Feet

When the government shut down on October 1st, most investors assumed it would be brief. Six weeks later, we're confronting something unprecedented: a complete blackout of government economic data during genuine uncertainty about the economy's direction.

What's missing:

• Monthly jobs reports

• GDP figures

• The Fed's preferred PCE inflation metric

• Weekly unemployment claims

• Consumer spending data

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the shutdown costs roughly $15 billion per week in economic activity, with permanent losses of $7-14 billion that will never be recovered.

Real-world impact:

• 1.4 million federal workers continue working without pay

• Food bank usage up 300% near military installations

• FAA cutting flight capacity 10% at 40 major airports due to understaffed control towers

Fed Chair Powell captured it perfectly: "What do you do when you're driving in the fog? You slow down."

The Fed cut rates 25bps on October 29th to 3.75%-4%, but Powell threw cold water on December expectations. Without data, the central bank can't confidently adjust policy. Markets quickly dialed back December cut odds from 90% to 67%.

The End of an Era: Pelosi's Retirement and the "Copy Trading" Reckoning

Thursday brought news that sent shockwaves through an unexpected corner of the investing world: Nancy Pelosi will retire from Congress in 2027, ending a 38-year career.

For legislators, her departure marks the end of an era. For retail investors tracking her trades, it signals something else: the loss of access to one of the market's most closely-watched portfolios.

The Pelosi trading phenomenon:

• 2024 returns: 54% gain, more than doubling the S&P 500's 25%

• Since 2014: 700%+ cumulative returns vs. S&P 500's 230%

• Only ranked 10th among congressional investors in 2024

This performance spawned a cottage industry:

• Twitter tracker accounts with 1.2 million followers

• ETF funds like "NANC" designed to replicate congressional trades

• The "Pelosi effect": Tempus AI surged 72% after her January call option purchase

The fundamental problems with copy trading:

1. Timing delay: Trades disclosed 30-45 days after execution — you're always late

2. Survivorship bias: We only hear about the winners (Nvidia, Broadcom), not the losers

3. Fragility: Strategy depends on continued access to a single source

4. Unsustainable: What happens when your source retires?

The irony: Many of Pelosi's best trades were in obvious growth stocks — Nvidia, Broadcom, Palo Alto Networks — that systematic momentum or quality strategies would have identified anyway. The "edge" may have been less about information than simply concentrating in tech leaders during an AI boom.

What this means for investors:

Pelosi's retirement exposes the flaw in "copy trading" mentality: it's reactive, dependent, and ultimately unsustainable. Strategies built around following politicians will either need new traders to track — always risky — or pivot to something more durable.

The better approach: Build investment strategies that don't depend on following anyone. Systematic approaches that work because they capture market anomalies, manage risk dynamically, or harvest documented return premiums. Strategies that function regardless of who's in Congress or which politicians file disclosure forms.

Sustainable outperformance comes from process, not access. From discipline, not inside information. From strategies that work whether Nancy Pelosi is trading or retired in San Francisco.

Supreme Court vs. Presidential Power: The Tariff Showdown

Wednesday's Supreme Court oral arguments revealed the administration's signature economic policy may rest on constitutionally shaky ground.

The case: Whether Trump had authority under IEEPA to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs:

• "Reciprocal tariffs": 10% baseline, up to 145% on Chinese goods

• "Trafficking tariffs": 25-35% on Canada, China, Mexico

• Total collected: ~$90 billion from American importers

The skepticism was bipartisan:

Chief Justice Roberts pressed on a fundamental point: tariffs function as taxes, and the Constitution gives Congress — not the president — the power to levy taxes.

Justice Kagan delivered perhaps the day's sharpest line: "It turns out, we're in emergencies… all the time, about, like, half the world."

Even conservative Justice Gorsuch questioned unlimited executive power, asking if the logic could extend to war declarations.

Prediction markets dropped odds of Trump prevailing from ~50% before the hearing to ~30% after. Small-cap stocks rallied 1.6% on hopes tariffs could be rolled back.

Even if the Court strikes down IEEPA-based tariffs, Trump retains other tools:

• Section 232 national security tariffs

• Section 122 for trade deficit responses

• Other statutory authorities requiring different procedures

The bigger question: Are we witnessing a genuine check on executive power, or just a procedural detour toward similar policies under different legal cover?

Tech's AI Arms Race: When Billions Become Trillions

While Washington grapples with constitutional questions, Silicon Valley is placing historic infrastructure bets.

Monday's blockbuster: Amazon and OpenAI announced a $38 billion cloud computing deal. Amazon stock jumped 4%, but the real story is the scale of AI capex:

• Amazon: Over $100 billion in 2025 capex, mostly on AI infrastructure

• All hyperscalers combined: Morgan Stanley estimates $550 billion in 2026, up 24%

• OpenAI alone: $1.4 trillion committed over the next decade to build 30 gigawatts of computing — enough to power 25 million homes

The tension: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman bristled when questioned about how a company with ~$15B in annual revenue justifies such spending: "We're doing well more revenue than that," he snapped, hinting at numbers closer to $20B+.

Market reaction mixed:

• Amazon rallied on the OpenAI deal

• AMD fell 3.9% despite beating earnings, as investors questioned near-term chip demand

The dilemma for investors: Companies are spending trillions with limited evidence that AI drives proportional revenue growth. As one JPMorgan strategist noted: "trillions of dollars being earmarked... relative to hundreds of billions of free cash flow" — but where are the returns?

The Fed's Impossible Position

The Federal Reserve is setting monetary policy with almost no current economic data — an unprecedented challenge.

The October 29th decision:

• Cut rates 25bps to 3.75%-4% (second consecutive cut)

• But Powell threw cold water on December: "not a foregone conclusion — far from it"

• Market odds of December cut dropped from 90% to 67%

The dilemma:

Signs of cooling:

• Labor market weakening (private data shows contraction)

• Consumer confidence at six-month low

• Fed statement acknowledged "downside risks to employment"

Inflation concerns persist:

• Last CPI reading (September): Core inflation still at 3%, above Fed's 2% target

• Tariffs keeping import costs elevated

The Fed also announced ending quantitative tightening on December 1st. The $6.6 trillion balance sheet will now stabilize.

Bottom line: Goldman Sachs still expects a December cut, arguing labor weakness matters more than incomplete data. Bank of America disagrees, noting the Fed rarely cuts during expansions with markets at highs and inflation above target.

The only certainty is uncertainty. Markets will be hypersensitive to any economic signals — earnings guidance, regional Fed surveys, even anecdotal reports from management teams.

Markets Price in the Unknown

November is historically the second-best performing month for the S&P 500 (average gain of 1.9% since 1950). Yet seasonal tailwinds are struggling against genuine uncertainty.

Current market signals:

• S&P 500 down ~1% this week, Nasdaq underperforming

• Small caps showing distress (below 50-day moving average)

• Monday saw 80%+ of S&P 500 stocks fall while index held steady — gains concentrated in mega-cap tech

• VIX elevated but not spiking

• Subtle rotation into defensives (staples, utilities, healthcare outperforming)

Earnings remain resilient: Over 80% of S&P 500 companies beat estimates this quarter. But forward guidance is cautious, with management teams citing "elevated uncertainty" and "limited visibility."

The challenge: Many signals we rely on to gauge economic health simply aren't available. We can't assess labor momentum without employment reports. We can't model inflation without comprehensive price data.

What we do have: systematic approaches that respond to what markets are actually doing rather than requiring forecasts about unknowable variables.

Strategy in Focus: AlphaFactory Protective

In uncertainty, strategies designed for these conditions shine.

AlphaFactory Protective dynamically adjusts between equities and gold based on market volatility. When markets are calm, it maintains full exposure to high-quality stocks selected on momentum and value. As volatility rises, it gradually shifts toward gold for portfolio stabilization.

With volatility elevated but not extreme, the strategy would typically hold a blend — partial equity exposure to capture any year-end rally, with meaningful gold allocation for downside protection if uncertainty deepens. It automatically rebalances as conditions change, removing emotional decision-making.

The tradeoff: In sharply rising markets, defensive positioning means giving up upside. But for investors navigating blind through 2025's remainder, systematic risk management offers a disciplined alternative to guessing.

The broader principle: When visibility is limited, process matters more than prediction. Diversification, rebalancing, and rules-based frameworks become especially valuable when traditional analysis tools are unavailable.

What Comes Next

Several catalysts loom as November progresses:

• Government shutdown: Can't continue indefinitely, but timing remains unpredictable

• Supreme Court ruling: Decision on tariffs likely within weeks, could reshape trade policy overnight

• Fed December meeting: Will data scarcity force them to stand pat?

The current landscape:

• S&P 500 sits ~3% below October highs

• Small caps and equal-weighted indices show more stress

• Market leadership narrowed to handful of mega-cap names

Bull case: Corporate earnings strong, consumer still spending, Fed in easing mode.

Bear case: Less information available than at any point in modern market history, constitutional challenges to major policies, central bank openly uncertain about next moves.

The temptation is to either panic or pretend everything is fine. Neither serves investors well. What does work is acknowledging uncertainty, sizing positions appropriately, and maintaining discipline around whatever framework you've committed to following.

The data will eventually return. The Supreme Court will rule. The Fed will find its footing. Until then, we're all driving in fog — and the smart money slows down, stays alert, and doesn't make sudden moves based on limited visibility.

That's not exciting advice. But in November 2025, boring might be the most valuable strategy of all.

The information contained in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Before making any investment decisions, consult with a qualified financial advisor to ensure any strategy aligns with your individual financial situation, goals, and risk tolerance

.